⚠️ UNOFFICIAL ARCHIVE — a snapshot of the former FAA Fire Safety website (fire.tc.faa.gov) as of October 2025, preserved from the Internet Archive. Historical record only; no longer updated. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. · About this archive
Background image
FAA Home      Site Map      DOT      Ask FAA      FAA Search
Formatting image
Home  |   Reports  |  Handbook  |  Conference  |  Information  |   Search  |  Tech Center
REPORTS
DOT/FAA/AR-03/34
DOT/FAA/AR-03/49
DOT/FAA/AR-TN00/20
DOT/FAA/AR-TN02/79
DOT/FAA/AR-TN03/52
DOT/FAA/AR-TN03/36
DOT/FAA/AR-TN03/6
DOT/FAA/AR-TN03/35
DOT/FAA/AR-02/49
DOT/FAA/AR-TN02/104
DOT/FAA/AR-02/50
DOT/FAA/AR-TN02/105
DOT/FAA/AR-01/37
DOT/FAA/AR-02/44
DOT/FAA/AR-02/51
DOT/FAA/AR-TN01/104
DOT/FAA/AR-02/53
DOT/FAA/AR-TN01/112
DOT/FAA/AR-99/63
DOT/FAA/AR-01/121
DOT/FAA/AR-01/117
DOT/FAA/AR-TN01/1
DOT/FAA/AR-TN01/60
DOT/FAA/AR-TN01/42
DOT/FAA/AR-95/5
DOT/FAA/AR-01/32
DOT/FAA/AR-TN01/75
DOT/FAA/AR-01/31
DOT/FAA/AR-01/53
DOT/FAA/AR-01/88
DOT/FAA/AR-01/63
FAA-RD-71-42
NASA/CR-2001-210903
DOT/FAA/AR-01/6
DOT/FAA/AR-99/44
DOT/FAA/AR-00/28
DOT/FAA/AR-TN99/93
DOT/FAA/AR-TN00/29
DOT/FAA/AR-00/19
DOT/FAA/AR-00/13
DOT/FAA/AR-00/12
DOT/FAA/AR-99/86
DOT/FAA/AR-99/73
NISTIR 6356
DOT/FAA/AR-TN99/64
DOT/FAA/AR-99/57
DOT/FAA/AR-TN99/65
DOT/FAA/AR-TN98/32
DOT/FAA/AR-TN99/29
DOT/FAA/AR-TN98/29
DOT/FAA/AR-TN98/30
DOT/FAA/AR-98/52
DOT/FAA/AR-98/26
DOT/FAA/ARTN-97-103
DOT/FAA/AR-97/58
DOT/FAA/AR-97/9
DOT/FAA/AR-96/122
DOT/FAA/AR-96/15
ARAC REPORT
HANDBOOK SECTION

 



Cabin & Fire Safety Reports

error-file:tidyout.log
Title: Mass Loading Effects on Fuel Vapor Concentration in an Aircraft Fuel Tank Ullage
Summary: This report discusses experiments performed within a simulated fuel tank approximately 1/20 the size of a typical B-747 center wing fuel tank (CWT). The vapors generated within the ullage of this tank were analyzed under different mass loadings in an effort to determine the effects of the mass loading and fuel distribution. It was determined from these tests that in order to have a substantial effect on the flammability of the vapor within the CWT, the mass loading would have to be somewhere between 0.08 and 0.15 kg/m 3 . A substantial effect was defined as a minimum 20% decrease in the maximum hydrocarbon count when compared to the average of all tests conducted with larger mass loadings. In addition, it was found that while the distribution of the fuel has no effect on the peak flammability (vapor composition) that is reached, it does have a significant effect on how long it takes to reach the final state. The less dispersed the liquid fuel is, the longer it will take the vapor to reach its maximum flammability point.
File: DOT/FAA/AR-TN99/65 Size: 934 Kb Pages: 14
error-file:tidyout.log
(To view the figures you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or later.)

 

error-file:tidyout.log
Title: Cargo Compartment Fire Protection in Large Commercial Transport Aircraft
Summary: This report describes recent research by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) related to cargo compartment fire protection in large transport aircraft. A gaseous hydrofluorocarbon, HFC-125, was compared to Halon 1301 in terms of fire suppression effectiveness and agent decomposition levels in the cargo compartment and passenger cabin during full-scale tests involving a bulk-loaded cargo fire.
File: DOT/FAA/AR-TN98/32 Size: 605 Kb Pages: 25
error-file:tidyout.log

 

error-file:tidyout.log
Title: Effectiveness of Flight Attendants Attempting to Extinguish Fires in an Accessible Cargo Compartment
Summary: This technical note documents the results of a project to evaluate the ability of flight attendants to extinguish cargo fires in small Class B cargo compartments. Thirteen fire tests were conducted in a modified Shorts 330 airplane in which flight attendants attempted to extinguish cargo fires. Some of the selected test variables included the cargo compartment size, the width of the access door, the size and type of fire extinguishers available, the presence and absence of an unobstructed center aisle in the cargo compartment, the type of Protective Breathing Equipment (PBE), and the delay between the smoke detector alarm and the start of the firefighting efforts. The results of the testing indicated that in most cases the flight attendants were unable to successfully extinguish these fires.
File: DOT/FAA/AR-TN99/29 Size: 515 Kb Pages: 11
error-file:tidyout.log
(To view the figures you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or later.)

 

error-file:tidyout.log
Title: Oxygen Enhanced Fires in LD-3 Cargo Containers
Summary: Four tests were conducted inside a 169-cubic-foot LD-3 cargo container to demonstrate the hazards associated with the release of gaseous oxygen during suppression of a smoldering fire with Halon 1301. The cargo fires were allowed to burn for a short duration before Halon 1301 was discharged into the container. After the suppressant concentration stabilized to about 3%, the minimum design concentration for inerting, a quantity of oxygen was discharged to simulate the relief of oxygen from an overpressurized cylinder. During the first three tests, 11 cubic feet of oxygen was bled into the container from a remote cylinder. A fourth test was conducted in which 22 cubic feet of oxygen was introduced which produced a severe fire that destroyed the container. Temperature, toxic gases, and halon concentration were measured continuously inside the container and video cameras recorded the tests from three locations external to the container.
File: DOT/FAA/AR-TN98/29 Size: 1.2 Mb Pages: 16
error-file:tidyout.log
(To view the figures you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or later.)


Page:  1  |  2   |  3  |   4  |  5  |   6  |   7  |   8  


formatting image
Questions about this page? Accessibility Privacy Policy

Contact Us
William J. Hughes Technical Center - AAR 440
Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405