Search Results
Records 31 to 35 of 1028
| Title: | Sources of Variability in Fire Test Data: A Case Study on Poly(aryl ether ether ketone) | ||||
| Author: | Ezgi S. Oztekin, Sean B. Crowley, Richard E. Lyon, Stanislav I. Stoliarov, Parina Patel, and T. Richard Hull | ||||
| Abstract: | In an effort to minimize uncertainties seen in bench scale tests, the sources of variability in fire test data were investigated. An earlier study?a PhD thesis written by Patel at the University of Central Lancaster, UK, in 2011 titled �Investigation of Fire Behavior of PEEK-based Polymers and Compounds�?on poly(arly ether ether ketone) (PEEK) showed that the fire performance parameters of this thermoplastic changed noticeably when exposed to moisture prior to the test. The present research is a follow-up study where a series of cone calorimetry tests were conducted on conditioned PEEK specimens to analyze the previously reported ignition time scatter and its relation to surface bubble formation. Pyrolysis modeling is, subsequently, carried out to relate the moisture content with the model parameters and to explain the possible physical mechanisms that cause the difference in ignition times between wet and dry samples. |
||||
| Report: | DOT/FAA/TC-TN12/42 | Pages: | 41 | Size: | 984 KB |
| Title: | Flammability Standardization Task Group�Final Reports: Federal Aviation Administration Draft Policy Memo, AMN-115-09-XXX, August 20, 2009 | ||||
| Author: | Scott Cambell, Michael Jensen, and Panade Sattayatam | ||||
| Abstract: | Please Note: A 508 compliant version of this report will be posted as soon as it is available. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a proposed policy statement, AMN-115-09-XXX, August 20, 2009, for the purpose of providing guidance on acceptable methods of compliance (MOC) for the flammability requirements of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 25 for commonly constructed parts, construction details, and materials. The proposed policy statement divides materials and design features into two categories.
Industry created the Flammability Standardization Task Group (FSTG) as an ad hoc action under the International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group (IAMFTWG). The FSTG then initiated a 2-year substantiation activity to validate the contents of the draft policy in support of the FAA issuing a final policy in 2012. In September 2009, the FSTG organized a subteam to investigate the parts of the draft policy. Approximately 200 people were involved with this effort to standardize and simplify flammability compliance across industry. Many companies supplied data, materials, and testing. The FSTG developed a process for substantiating each item in the draft policy memo. Test plans were developed and approved by industry and then made available to the FAA for concurrence. The test plan was then executed (occasionally with changes) and the data were gathered. The data were analyzed and a final report was posted for industry concurrence, followed by an FAA review. In the final report, the FSTG recommended using the MOC as written in the proposed policy; not using the proposed policy MOC; or, based on the data and analysis, using a modified approach to the MOC. The FSTG provided briefings of its activities to the IAMFTWG on a regular basis. The IAMFTWG participation is open to the public. |
||||
| Report: | DOT/FAA/TC-12/10 | Pages: | 881 | Size: | 37 MB |
| Title: | An Evaluation of Equivalent Levels of Safety Findings and Exemptions Relating to Cabin Safety Regulations for Smaller Transport Airplanes | ||||
| Author: | R.G.W. Cherry & Associates Limited | ||||
| Abstract: | This study has evaluated Equivalent Level of Safety (ELOS) Findings and Exemptions relating to the cabin safety requirements in Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 25 that involved transport category airplanes with a maximum certificated passenger capacity of up to 60 seats. The results of this study can be used as an indication of the relevance and applicability of certain requirements to this airplane category, and could form a basis for future research studies. A review of the Federal Aviation Administration database up to February 2006 found a total of 98 ELOS and Exemption applications appropriate for this study. The applications were classified under 15 categories, and the categories having more than 4 original applications were given further consideration. These Categories are related to:
It was found that some of these subjects are not exclusive to smaller transport airplanes. This is mainly because the applications were related to the type of operation and configuration that require specific features, such as executive interior or air ambulance configuration that can be installed in both large and smaller transport airplanes. However, some of these issues may be more prevalent in smaller transport airplanes. It was also found that other issues are related to the size of the airplane, in that the pertinent requirements may be considered more appropriate to larger transport airplanes. |
||||
| Report: | DOT/FAA/AR-09/32 | Pages: | 131 | Size: | 757 KB |
| Title: | The Collection of Ice in Jet A-1 Fuel Pipes | ||||
| Author: | Thomas C. Maloney | ||||
| Abstract: | Ice collection and blockages in fuel systems have been of interest to the aerospace community since their discovery in the late 1950s when a B-52 crashed. A recent growth of interest was provoked by several incidents that occurred within the last few years. This study seeks to understand the underlying principles of ice growth in fuel flow systems. Tests were performed in a recirculated fuel system with a fuel tank that held approximately 115 gallons of Jet A-1 fuel, and ice accumulation was observed in two removable test pipes. The setup was in an altitude chamber capable of reaching -60�F, and the experiments involved fullscale flow components. Initially, tests were performed (stage I) to better understand the system and the variables that affected accumulation. First, initial conditions within the test pipes were varied. Also, pipe geometry, pipe surface properties, initial water content of the fuel, and heat transfer from the fuel pipe were varied. As a result of the tests, observations were made about other effects involved in the study. The effects include the result of sequentially run tests, the effect of the fuel on the freezing temperature of the entrained water, the effect of ice accumulation on pipe welds, and the effect of the test pipe entrance and exit flow conditions on ice accumulation. The results of initial tests were qualitative. Later quantitative tests were performed (stage II) to demonstrate the dependence of temperature, Reynolds number, and heat transfer on ice accumulation. Tests were quantified with a pressure increase across the pipe sections that was normalized by the expected theoretical initial pressure. As a result of these tests the effect of contamination in the fuel was revealed. The results of stage I showed that accumulation of soft ice was greatest when a layer of hard ice had initially formed on the pipe surface. Stainless steel collected more ice than Teflon�, and there was a lack of a preferential accumulation region downstream of a pipe bend. A greater heat transfer from the pipe increased ice accumulation for aluminum that was made rough with 80-grit sand paper and for Teflon. Water collected in the pipe system as the number of tests increased and the freeze temperature of either the hard or soft ice was about 0�C. Finally, results of stage I tests showed that stainless steel pipe welds were a preferred sight for ice to accumulate. Repeatability was done first in stage II, and the normalized pressure increase for two 3/4�� uninsulated pipe tests were within 7%. Normalized pressure increased across a pipe as the Reynolds number decreased. A 50% increase in the Reynolds number led to a 40% decrease in characteristic normalized pressure increase (CNPI). Tests were performed at three temperatures, and ice accumulated the most at -11�C. The CNPI at -11�C was about 3 times greater than the CNPI at -7�C and about 60 times greater than the CNPI at -1�C. A greater heat transfer from the fuel pipe increased ice accumulation. For the amount of time that the tests ran, the total normalized pressure increase was about 0.9 greater for an uninsulated pipe than for an insulated pipe. Contamination in the fuel increased the amount of soft ice that collected in the system. The CNPI for the more contaminated fuel was more than double the case with less contaminated fuel. Possible solutions for the prevention or decrease of ice accumulation in aircraft fuel systems based on the results of this study are insulated pipes, a change in the type of pipe material, a higher fuel flow rate, and cleaner fuel. The fuel temperature could also be altered to avoid temperatures where the most ice accumulates. |
||||
| Report: | DOT/FAA/TC-TT12/29 | Pages: | 118 | Size: | 2.14 MB |
| Title: | Combustion Characteristics of Adhesive Compounds Used in the Construction of Aircraft Cabin Materials | ||||
| Author: | Natallia Safronava and Richard Lyon | ||||
| Abstract: | Adhesives are widely used in the aviation industry to construct lightweight and fatigue resistant aircraft cabin materials. Presently, there is no separate requirement for the flammability of adhesives, potting compounds, and fillers used in construction of cabin materials. The Flammability Standardization Task Group is an aircraft industry group that has proposed testing adhesives using the 12- and 60-second Vertical Bunsen Burner (VBB) Fire Tests requirements for cabin materials in Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 25.853 to demonstrate that new adhesives have similar flammability to those used in certified cabin materials. Cabin materials pass or fail the VBB tests based on criteria for burn length, after-flame time, and time required for flaming drips to extinguish. The present study was conducted to determine whether the microscale combustion calorimeter (MCC) could also be used to establish similarity of aircraft adhesives, potting compounds, and fillers. To this end, thermal combustion properties were measured by MCC for 37 adhesives, edge fillers, and potting compounds, and the results were compared to VBB ratings to determine whether the former could be used to predict the latter. |
||||
| Report: | DOT/FAA/TC-TN12/12 | Pages: | 25 | Size: | 407 KB |
First
Previous